It is easy to become wise if you live in a place where there has been a war for 9 years, and you do not run to where there is no war, but instead you are looking for an answer to the question: what to do?
Relying on a hydro turbine will drastically reduce the options for choosing a place of residence. And, right away! Moreover, the sacrifices for the sake of this source of energy may subsequently be huge, and the source itself may eventually dry out or become banned.
Behind the beautiful abbreviation PV lies a real horror: the limited charge-discharge cycles of batteries (from 400 to 1200 for lead, and up to 3000 for new lithium), short circuits of some battery cells, power electronics of a powerful DC-to-AC converter, controller malfunctions battery charge, failures in the lithium cell balancing system, lack of sun, especially in winter, etc. And all this will take place in the realities of war, when none of this nearby can be obtained, bought, or brought …
At the same time, cars without fuel are usually worth nothing. And many of them can be damaged, as was the case in Mariupol and other Ukrainian cities. In this case, the internal combustion engine can remain intact or be a donor of spare parts. Not every abandoned house has surviving photovoltaic systems.
I am not a supporter of the apocalypse, but it looks like the war will go on for a long time, because there are still a lot of resources for it, and its real goals, hidden from people, are terrible in nature, and have not yet been achieved.
I vote for a comprehensive and integrated approach to solving the problem of “where and how to live”! And not just for beautifully advertised temporary solutions with a bunch of pitfalls. Different conditions of peace and war dictate different concepts of the beauty of the energy supply system. Coal dust on hands in peacetime looks ugly, but the electric light from the same charcoal in wartime glows with magic in the darkness.