Nice refueling station. The price is right, (DOC) Drive On Charcoal for free.
Bob
3 Likes
bob, i have a very bad internet connection… so i cannot upload videos, otherwise i would have done…
5 Likes
bob, do you know is there an optimum , how deep the inner pipe of the cyclone goes down under the level of the entrance pipe??
ciao giorgio
3 Likes
With my cyclone the gases are introduced at the top side of the syclone. The gases are spining next to the inside wall and spining down wards. My inside exit pipe is about 3 1/2" into the cyclone.
Sorry the pictures are not in order, I did a very bad thing here. JO MIGHT HAVE NOTICED. In the back ground of the picture that I had to remove very quickly was the WK Firetube showing the build of it. It now has a white towel over it. I saw the picture zoomed in on them and Panic! @JO_Olsson did you notice what I did?
The gas entrance square tubing ie 3" , the exit pipe is 1/2" below the incoming gases.
Inside pipe is 2 1/2" .
cyclone has a tamper it helps speed up the gases as they move downwards.
Here is where my cyclone filter is different. It has a spring loaded swing gate in the entrance, at low gas flows the gate is almost closed ,but at high gas flows the gate comes open. This keeps the gases traveling to the out side wall and causes the spinning downward motion then slows down dropping the particles out of the gases and then spins upwards into the exit pipe. This cyclone works at low speeds and high speeds.
There is a deflector that is not shown for the entrance square tubing and connection.
Here is a picture with the swing gate
Why is this cyclone so big is I made to operate on a big engine like a 5.2 L. I have only tested it on large and small engines. It works.
Bob
9 Likes
Haha! No, Bob. I didn’t notice. I was too busy studying your spring loaded flap. I never saw one before - only read about them.
3 Likes
Thats good. My heart sank when I up loaded the pictures with all the detail of my WK firetube there in plan sight. I do not want Chris S. having to talk to me again. Lol.
Bob
4 Likes
bob, thank you very much for the detailled doku of your cyclone, the swing gate i have read about in tilmans swiss book…
the inner pipe of my second cyclone i have made deeper down, approximately 3/4 or one inch down under gas entrance, the first of the red mower is simil like yours…but seems also the longer pipe works well, i think because of the absence of a conus…
ciao giorgio
4 Likes
A little longer pipe inside the cyclone is fine. If it works good there will be ash, soot in the bottom to dump out.
Bob
3 Likes
Here are data on the dimensions of cyclones, they can be reduced directly for smaller flows, and the geometry remains the same.
4 Likes
Is there a chart that goes with the size for the approximate flow rate?
2 Likes
Stephen Abbadessa said on his website that you want the diameter of the cyclone to be 3 times the inlet pipe diameter. So a 2" would need a 6" cylinder portion.
He uses a straight cylinder and gets decent results.
4 Likes
The main thing I have observed is the cyclone should not be a point where you are causing gases to drag because of restictions. This is why I built the gate type entrance that will open if needed. It closes on low gas demand and opens up on high gas demands, this keeps the gases spinning in the cyclone causing the particals to fall out.
Any extra gas drag in the system can work against you in your gasifier.
A example of this is in my 92 Dodge Dakota WK Gasifier. It should be able to run a much larger engine. But I have a restriction at the intake of the auto mixer. It’s gas opening is only 1 7/8" opening not 2" opening. Only a 1/8" is enough to limit my gasifier operation, if I open my manual add extra gas valve what a difference at highway speeds. It excellerates faster and I can get more speed. I am sure I could over pull my WK Gasifier with the manual valve open.
Now lets move that restriction to the cyclone filter area, it would be the same results of limiting the gas flow to the engine.
I am sure this was why Wayne chooses the drop box instead of the normal fixed opening intake of a cyclone filter when running a WK Gasifier. Less restriction of gases flowing at higher end perfomance.
This all changes when operating a charcoal gasifier, or I should say other gasifier designs.
My rule of thumb. Is this the restriction should be a the hot lobe of the charcoal at the restriction opening if you have one, or above the grate if you have one. Not in your filter area or intake opning of the engine or any where else in the gasifier system ahead of the hot lobe or after the grate area.
These are my thoughts on of what I have observed in my gasifier builds and my operations only.
Yours may differ.
Bob
5 Likes
So when the flapper gate closes on low demand, do the gasses redirect or does it just reduce the amount of gas coming in to still allow enough swirl?
1 Like
The gate directs the gases to the outside wall of the cyclone causing the gases to spin down the wall of the cyclone the gases form a vortex movement as it goes to the bottom then the particals drop out as the gases slow down and vortex back up slowly into the exit pipe. When the vortex changes direction the particals fall into the bottom trap or holding area to be dump out later.
Bob
2 Likes
He was aiming for an easy build and was only get about 90% of the stuff. You can get like 99+% with a cyclone But you have to design it for the proper airflow, and they work best with constant velocity which is harder to achieve with a ice engine. Different velocities within the same cyclone will get different results as to how fine of particles it can remove.
For good cyclone operation, there is some math’s behind it, thus I was asking if there was a chart that went with it. 
1 Like
Sean, unfortunately I have to disappoint you, I saved this dimensional document years ago when a now deceased master designed a cyclone in the production process because there was a lot of dust and we had to change filters daily, the cyclone eliminated more than 90% of the dust. Unfortunately I don’t have the full flow data document, but I think if you have a 1 "tube reduce the dimensions from the sketch above 5x and it will work optimally.
No disappointment. I kind of figured that was the case, but was hoping it wasn’t 
Two posts prior to yours has a reference to a book with the needed calculations in probably a little more detail then needed to try and calculate. I’m sure most people don’t feel like doing all the math either.
3 Likes
I feel like 90% efficiency is more than acceptable given the simplicity of the construction. As long as it stretches out the time between cleaning intervals for my cooling rails and gives the bag filter an easier time I’ll take it. I more or less am just trying to prevent embers from burning the cloth of my filter.
3 Likes
Not sure if this chart will be of any help.
8 Likes
Right, that is the trade off in a nutshell, and an explanation of the saying “the last 10% is 90% of the work.” I was really just curious if Tone had the cross reference chart. I was guessing no, but thought I would ask anyway.
3 Likes