Great post Mr Wayne
I have been calling your WK evoled system now in phone and e-mail exchanges as a “Long Path System”. Well it is! You have twice the gasses flow lengths built into you vehicle conversion system as even the installed factory licensed Imberts had. And they were the longest flow path systems of thier day. Even shows this on the very few transportable trailer mounted Imberts “stationery’s” pictured. Smart. Very smart.
This style of designing/building is the very best for a DYI’er to do, use, and understand. Can see this in Phil Coveys, David Blooms?, Jim Masons pre-GEK work and Ben Petersons earlier works.
Tendency of the stationary guys however is to go intergrated, stacked and more compact. I am not criticizing this eveolution you can now see taking place with Matt Ryders and even Arvid Olsens works. These guys all coping with materials costs, fabrication costs, and especially system shipping costs. Smallest footprint possible systems also what thier buyers are demanding. The more sqeezed small compacted you go you really better have paid your many systems built, ran and learned from development dues!
DYI for sure use a long gasses path with many clean out ports to make your life easier. PalF and Chris Seymores works show this. Yours, Mike LaRosa’s always have these features.
To Grate or not grate; inactive or active grate and the motion of it; and bridging issues seem to be very fuel(s) type used related in stationary use.
Bridging issues also IMHO have often gone back to large oversized “long run” hopper capacities built into stationaries that then overload the available rising internal hearth core heats abilty to vaporize off and keep these condensables moving and vaporized, AND then in hopper system condensed out and remove these now free liquid moistures quickly without resteaming and recirculating them.
Wayne, you do this better now than anyone else in the world that I am aware of.
Oversizing long run hopper building always seems to internally condense and form tars causing fuel particle gluing, sticky wall rings forming and fuel bridged caps. Yep. Long constant speed engine runs really promotes this tendency too.
Smallish hopper capacities are in my opinion one of the many keys to your improved system performance. Not a limitation. But a solution to a real problems.
AGAIN. Many of the stationary guy are NOT intending to use a pure chunked wood fuel - but high ash “diffcult” clinker prone making fuels.
Even a simple small engine mechanical coupled vibration can Down a system under some batch cycle conditions by contiously shaking too much good char below the grate killing the process. Electric demand shaking would “seem” to be the answer but then adds cost, complexity, and gonna have sooner versus later more failure points. Seen it. Cracked mounts. Motor bearing failures. Burnt up switches/relays. Controller wig-outs.
So . . . I have to respecfully disagree in that I think good stationary deveopement overall is more difficult to pull off susessfully for long term use.
I DO absolutly agree the solution always is an active involed, expereinced operator.
Google up and download a readable copy of the Internet put up book about “A Whole Town Powered by Woodgas”. No majic gasifier, cooling filtering systems. No super specially ground up formed uniform fuel stocks. Ha! Ha! BIG, they were using pretty big whole tree chunks from an elevated purpose built fuelwood cutting supply mill. Key was apprenticed learned, experienced operators 24/7 knowing where to thump, whap, and air/fuel adjust, grate shake and ash remove and engine repair to keep em up running and electrically generating for thier township and local hospital.
Good read with pictures.
Any way you cut it (pun) woodfuel energy genrating ain’t easy. What I like about it. Takes an active working thinking human to make it work. Push button, turn key energies are for people willing to allow themselves to be turned into specialized $$$$ harnessed 'till they drop worker insect Consumers versus Producers.
Resectfully
Steve Unruh